RIP WOIPTV

[Drewey73]

Having been a part of this site pretty much from the beginning I've seen it grow from nothing to a really good community sharing all sorts of resources
My opinion the moderators are one of the reasons I stopped sharing on here and probably same for many others
As for 1/2btc shame you've no chance
Again RIP WOIPTV

 

[Kenxo]

My opinion the moderators are one of the reasons I stopped sharing on here and probably same for many others

Can you be more specific, as there are only three of us, and explain to the public what the reasons were? Also, what was your share of capital or skills that caused us and you difficulties?

 

[mainpro105]

Well most of the link here is not working and you waste your only 1 download of resource and need to wait for 24 hours each time
that you want to check if the link is valid

its unfair

 

[redhat]

Having been a part of this site pretty much from the beginning I've seen it grow from nothing to a really good community sharing all sorts of resources
My opinion the moderators are one of the reasons I stopped sharing on here and probably same for many others
As for 1/2btc shame you've no chance
Again RIP WOIPTV

Thanks for sharing your opinion — although it sounds less like feedback and more like disappointment that you’re no longer part of something you chose to step away from.

Just to clarify one thing: the ½ BTC is my asking price for World of IPTV. It’s not a joke, not a “shame”, and certainly not wishful thinking — it’s a valuation based on the project, its history, and its potential. Disagreeing with the price is fine; dismissing it without understanding the value usually says more about perspective than about worth.

Moderation didn’t kill the platform, and neither did its value suddenly disappear. Projects don’t lose their worth just because some people stopped engaging — sometimes they gain it.

But anyway, best of luck wherever you decide to contribute next.
RIP WOIPTV — though it’s usually declared dead by those who no longer have a stake in it.

Take care.

 

[redhat]

Well most of the link here is not working and you waste your only 1 download of resource and need to wait for 24 hours each time
that you want to check if the link is valid

its unfair

We do not review or moderate content that is several years old, and we have no control over external source links shared by members that may eventually stop working. Members always have the option to report broken or invalid sources, and once reported, we will remove them accordingly.

But all of this has already been discussed multiple times.

 

[mainpro105]

We do not review or moderate content that is several years old, and we have no control over external source links shared by members that may eventually stop working. Members always have the option to report broken or invalid sources, and once reported, we will remove them accordingly.

But all of this has already been discussed multiple times.

Yep i agree with you

is there any chance that a mode will check the links once in a while to prevent this from happend?


or after that i try to download a broken link to ask refresh the download limit faster?

 

[CentOS]

Allow me to share my humble opinion
@redhat please don't take this the wrong way, I've always avoided expressing myself.

The current limited resource download system is really complicated; I've kind of given up sometimes.

70% of the resources have broken links; we've simply burned through our only daily limit.

I really think the current resource system needs an overhaul to encourage us to have new resources again.

I also think your team and moderators should review some resources with broken links and remove them.

This is just my humble opinion, please don't take it the wrong way.

I like the forum; it's just a positive opinion.

 

[Kenxo]

I also think your team and moderators should review some resources with broken links and remove them.

How much time would it take to check 3,500 resources to see if they’re online or not? Even if we test them once a day, there’s no guarantee they won’t go down the next day—or even just minutes later. That’s why it might take around 100 moderators to keep up with this.

 

[CentOS]

Yes, I completely agree with you, it's really difficult.

But on the other hand, it's also embarrassing to use up your only daily allowance with a broken resource.

It's difficult for everyone.

 

[redhat]

Allow me to share my humble opinion
@redhat please don't take this the wrong way, I've always avoided expressing myself.

The current limited resource download system is really complicated; I've kind of given up sometimes.

You and every other can express your opinion, as long as the tone of voice, is not insulting, profanity, insulting, humiliating.

70% of the resources have broken links; we've simply burned through our only daily limit.

You complained that 70% of the resources are down, which would mean that 7 out of 10 downloads were down. If that's the case, I'd like to ask you, did you report those 7 resources as being down? I guess not.
Unfortunately, some expect everything to be perfect, but contribute almost nothing (I'm not addressing you personally, I'm speaking generally). Unfortunately, members also often jsut complaining, instead of coming up with logical and technically feasible solutions.

The limitation of the limits has clear reasons, which are of course annoying on the one hand, but on the other hand simply prevent leeching.

I really think the current resource system needs an overhaul to encourage us to have new resources again.

Yes, I completely agree with you; members can actively help by reporting down resources instead of simply ignoring them.

I also think your team and moderators should review some resources with broken links and remove them.

As @Kenxo already mentioned, unfortunately hat's not possible; it's impossible to check all that content individually. Members should normally remove content they've shared but that's no longer available, don't you think?

This is just my humble opinion, please don't take it the wrong way.

I like the forum; it's just a positive opinion.

Thank you for sharing your kind and honest opinion.